Extra username and password are necessary for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details

Delay in recording confessional statement is probably not treated fatal on the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)

4.  It has been noticed by this Court that there is actually a delay of in the future in the registration of FIR which has not been explained because of the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness of your alleged incidence along with the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession with the petitioners has long been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram took place being the real brothers with the deceased but they didn't react at all to the confessional statements with the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, a single after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not search much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is not any explanation as to why her arrest was not effected after making on the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on so many events that extra judicial confession of an accused is actually a weak style of evidence which could be manoeuvred from the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not occur their way. The prosecution can also be relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word as to existence of some light for the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners with each other on the motorcycle at 4.

competent authority and if any appeal or representation is filed the same shall be decided(Promotion)

“Ensuring the precision of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple trustworthy sources is essential for reliable legal research.”

This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may possibly interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mold the relief to make it appropriate to the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or even the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified by the decision in the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment of the grid project and submitted that adequate mitigation measures were in place to render any prospective adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to get designed.

This guide provides beneficial insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case legislation, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.

The prosecution presented substantial evidence, like eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature on the seized currency.

In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution might be justified when The fundamental norm underlying a Constitution disappears and a new system is place in its place.

Finally, a vital contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration with the Court under Article 184 (3), is setting a precedent which allows for much easier access for the public to technique the superior courts plus the subordinate courts on environment related issues.

To invoke section 300 and 302 just because death has occurred is the most significant tragedy of all. It does the precise opposite of what a legal system is there to accomplish, i.e. secure its citizens.

A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition on the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Growth Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of the electricity grid station in their neighborhood, on designated “green belt” property. The Court listened to the matter like a human rights case, as Article 184 (3) from the Pakistan Constitution offers original jurisdiction into the Supreme Court to consider up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.

The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were explained to of your boy’s past, they asked if their children were safe click here with him in their home. The therapist certain them that they'd nothing at all to fret about.